More than anything else, the future of the U.S.A. is fully dependent upon the skills of its citizens. And in spite of that simple fact, Congress, and most state legislatures, are falling all over themselves to cut back our investment in education. Tom Friedman's column in today's New York Times makes this point exactly. You need to read it.
Do You Want the Good News First?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Seattle
I’VE spent the last week traveling to two of America’s greatest
innovation hubs — Silicon Valley and Seattle — and the trip left me
feeling a combination of exhilaration and dread. The excitement comes
from not only seeing the stunning amount of innovation emerging from the
ground up, but from seeing the new tools coming on stream that are, as
Amazon.com’s founder, Jeff Bezos, put it to me, “eliminating all the
gatekeepers” — making it easier and cheaper than ever to publish your
own book, start your own company and chase your own dream. Never have
individuals been more empowered, and we’re still just at the start of
this trend.
“I see the elimination of gatekeepers everywhere,” said Bezos. Thanks to
cloud computing for the masses, anyone anywhere can for a tiny hourly
fee now rent the most powerful computing and storage facilities on
Amazon’s “cloud” to test any algorithm or start any company or publish
any book. Start-ups can even send all their inventory to Amazon, and it
will do all the fulfillment and delivery — and even gift wrap your
invention before shipping it to your customers.
This is leading to an explosion of new firms and voices. “Sixteen of the
top 100 best sellers on Kindle today were self-published,” said Bezos.
That means no agent, no publisher, no paper — just an author, who gets
most of the royalties, and Amazon and the reader. It is why, Bezos adds,
the job of the company leader now is changing fast: “You have to think
of yourself not as a designer but as a gardener” — seeding, nurturing,
inspiring, cultivating the ideas coming from below, and then making sure
people execute them.
The leading companies driving this trend — Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft,
Google, Apple, LinkedIn, Zynga and Twitter — are all headquartered and
listed in America. Facebook, which didn’t exist nine years ago, just
went public at a valuation of nearly $105 billion — two weeks after
buying a company for $1 billion, Instagram, which didn’t exist 18 months
ago. So why any dread?
It’s because we’re leaving an era of some 50 years’ duration in which to
be a president, a governor, a mayor or a college president was, on
balance, to give things away to people; and we’re entering an era — no
one knows for how long — in which to be a president, a governor, a mayor
or a college president will be, on balance, to take things away from
people. And if we don’t make this transition in a really smart way — by
saying, “Here are the things that made us great, that spawned all these
dynamic companies” — and make sure that we’re preserving as much of that
as we can, this trend will not spread as it should. Maybe we could grow
as a country without a plan. But we dare not cut without a plan. We can
really do damage. I can lose weight quickly if I cut off both arms, but
it will surely reduce my job prospects.
What we must preserve is that magic combination of cutting-edge higher
education, government-funded research and immigration of high-I.Q.
risk-takers. They are, in combination, America’s golden goose, laying
all these eggs in Seattle and Silicon Valley. China has it easy right
now. It just needs to do the jobs that we have already invented, just
more cheaply. America has to invent the new jobs — and that requires
preserving the goose.
Microsoft still does more than 80 percent of its research work in
America. But that is becoming harder and harder to sustain when deadlock
on Capitol Hill prevents it from acquiring sufficient visas for the
knowledge workers it needs that America’s universities are not producing
enough of. The number of filled jobs at Microsoft went up this year
from 40,000 to 40,500 at its campus outside Seattle, yet its list of
unfilled jobs went from 4,000 to almost 5,000. Eventually, it will have
no choice but to shift more research to other countries.
It is terrifying to see how budget-cutting in California is slowly
reducing what was once one of the crown jewels of American education —
the University of California system — to a shadow of its old self. And I
fear the cutting is just beginning. As one community leader in Seattle
remarked to me, governments basically do three things: “Medicate,
educate and incarcerate.” And various federal and state mandates outlaw
cuts in medicating and incarcerating, so much of the money is coming out
of educating. Unfortunately, even to self-publish, you still need to
know how to write. The same is happening to research. A new report just
found that federal investment in biomedical research through the
National Institutes of Health has decreased almost every year since
2003.
When we shrink investments in higher education and research, “we shoot
ourselves in both feet,” remarked K.R. Sridhar, founder of Bloom Energy,
the Silicon Valley fuel-cell company. “Our people become less skilled,
so you are shooting yourself in one foot. And the smartest people from
around the world have less reason to come here for the quality
education, so you are shooting yourself in the other foot.”
The Labor Department reported two weeks ago that even with our high
national unemployment rate, employers advertised 3.74 million job
openings in March. That is, in part, about a skills mismatch. In an
effort to overcome that, and help fill in the financing gap for higher
education in Washington State, Boeing and Microsoft recently supported a
plan whereby the state, which was cutting funding to state universities
but also not letting them raise tuition, would allow the colleges to
gradually raise rates and the two big companies would each kick in $25
million for scholarships for students wanting to study science and
technology or health care to ensure that they have the workers they
need.
This is not a call to ignore the hard budget choices we have to make.
It’s a call to make sure that we give education, immigration and
research their proper place in the discussion.
“Empowering the individual and underinvesting in the collective is our
great macro danger as a society,” said the pollster Craig Charney.
Indeed, it is. Investment in our collective institutions and
opportunities is the only way to mitigate the staggering income
inequalities that can arise from a world where Facebook employees can
become billionaires overnight, while the universities that produce them
are asked to slash billions overnight. As I’ve said, nations that don’t
invest in the future tend not to do well there.
No comments:
Post a Comment