Given my rant yesterday about student debt and how universities are run, this article in today's New York Times is fascinating!!
To give you some context about how universities spend money, here is a little story. When I first started at the California State University, the Dean of the Business School has a secretary and a part time student assistant to run the school.
When I left, twenty-five years later, enrollment had doubled and the office of the Dean had thirty-four vice-presidents, senior advisers, specialists, miscellaneous personnel.
Read on (and remember this guy is paid over $2 Million to be the President at Ohio State.)
Slowly, as Student Debt Rises, Colleges Confront Costs
By ANDREW MARTIN
COLUMBUS, Ohio — In a wood-paneled office lined with books, sports 
memorabilia and framed posters (including John Belushi in “Animal 
House”), E. Gordon Gee, the president of The Ohio State University, 
keeps a framed quotation that reads, “If you don’t like change, you’re 
going to like irrelevance even less.”        
Mr. Gee, who is often identified with a big salary and spendthrift ways,
 says he has taken the quotation to heart, and he is now trying to 
persuade Ohio State’s vast bureaucracy, and the broader world of academia, to do the same. 
At a time of diminished state funding for higher education and uncertain
 federal dollars, Mr. Gee says that public colleges and universities 
need to devise a new business model to pay for the costs of education, 
beyond sticking students with higher tuition and greater debt. 
“The notion that universities can do business the very same way has to 
stop,” said Mr. Gee, who is also the chairman of a commission studying 
college attainment, including the impact of student debt. 
College presidents across the country are confronting the same 
realization, trying to manage their institutions with fewer state 
dollars without sacrificing quality or all-important academic rankings. 
Tuition increases had been a relatively easy fix but now — with the 
balance of student debt topping $1 trillion and an increasing number of 
borrowers struggling to pay — some administrators acknowledge that they 
cannot keep putting the financial onus on students and their families.
Increasingly, they are looking for other ways to pay for education, 
stepping up private fund-raising, privatizing services, cutting staff, 
eliminating departments — even saving millions of dollars by 
standardizing things like expense forms.
And Wall Street is watching. 
Moody’s Investors Service, in a report earlier this year, said it had a 
favorable outlook for the nation’s most elite private colleges and large
 state institutions, those with the “strongest market positions” that 
had multiple ways to generate revenue. Ohio State, for instance, 
received a stable outlook from Moody’s last fall, though the report 
cautioned about the school’s debt and reliance on its medical center for
 revenue.        
But Moody’s issued a negative outlook for a majority of colleges and 
universities heavily dependent on tuition and state revenue. 
“Tuition levels are at a tipping point,” Moody’s wrote, adding later, 
“We anticipate an ongoing bifurcation of student demand favoring the 
highest quality and most affordable higher education options.”        
Many colleges are top-heavy with administrators and woefully 
inefficient, having not undertaken the kind of paring public companies 
did years ago — until now.
“Schools are very good at adding new things, new programs,” said 
Sherideen S. Stoll, vice president for finance and administration at 
Bowling Green State University in Ohio. “We are not so good at looking 
at things we have been doing for 20 or 30 years and saying, ‘Should we 
be offering those academic programs?’ ” 
At Bowling Green, 62 percent of graduates have debt that averages 
$31,515, the highest of public universities in Ohio. In addition to 
raising tuition, which has been limited by state-mandated caps, the 
university has laid off employees, encouraged early retirements, 
required unpaid furloughs and limited pay increases, Ms. Stoll said. The
 belt-tightening hasn’t yet reached the point that academic quality has 
suffered, she said, but Bowling Green may not be able to offer as much 
in the future.
“We’ve done everything and anything to try to operate much more efficiently,” she said. 
The problems aren’t confined to public colleges. Administrators at some 
nonprofit private institutions said they too had come to realize they 
could not keep raising tuition and fees. Families have become more 
price-sensitive since the economic collapse and are seeking deeper 
discounts on the sticker price. 
“We know the model is not sustainable,” said Lawrence T. Lesick, vice 
president for enrollment management at Ohio Northern University. 
“Schools are going to have to show the value proposition. Those that 
don’t aren’t going to be around.” 
Before the economic crisis, both public and private colleges 
participated in a costly “arms race” to provide better amenities to lure
 the best students and faculty: new dormitories with one student to a 
room, frequent sabbaticals for professors, upscale cafeteria food, 
expanded counseling services and gymnasiums that rival the fanciest 
health clubs in Manhattan. 
And other costs have grown, too. Health care costs have taken a toll, 
since colleges are labor-intensive, and so has the expense of keeping up
 with technology, like wireless Internet and new computers. Here at Ohio
 State, where tuition has increased by nearly 60 percent since 2002, 
there is a gleaming new student union, climbing walls that can 
accommodate 50 students at a time and $2 billion in construction 
projects under way.        
Mr. Gee’s compensation package this year, moreover, is worth about $2 
million, and The Chronicle of Higher Education has called him the 
highest-paid public university president. The Dayton Daily News recently
 reported that Mr. Gee had billed Ohio State for $550,000 in travel in 
the last two years. 
The travel expenses prompted some to question if Mr. Gee practices what he preaches. 
“He’s very capable. He’s a very smart guy, and he’s engaging and all 
these things,” said Dale Butland, a spokesman for Innovation Ohio, a 
nonprofit policy research group. But he added, “Students and their 
parents who are struggling, not just with coming up with the money, but 
paying off the debt, I think there is a disconnect between what they are
 being asked to do and what they are seeing the leader of the university
 doing.”
Mr. Gee maintains that Ohio State is getting its money’s worth. On his 
watch, Ohio State has become a more prestigious university, he says, 
while remaining a relative bargain, even with fewer resources from the 
state. It now receives just 7 percent of its budget from the state.     
   
Ohio State costs about $25,000 a year for in-state residents who live on
 campus. The average debt for graduates who borrow is $24,480.
A lanky 68-year-old who is known for his bow ties, horn-rimmed glasses 
and sometimes zany antics (he has shown up, unannounced, at 21st 
birthday parties for his students, which he finds on Facebook), Mr. Gee 
has had the top job at five universities, including twice at Ohio State.
 He returned to the Columbus campus in 2007 after stints at Brown and 
Vanderbilt. Mr. Gee acknowledges that college affordability and student 
debt are growing problems that university presidents long ignored. He 
said they now needed to address them quickly. 
“We have not been as conscious about costs as we should be, and that has now come home to roost,” he said. 
Like many other college presidents, Mr. Gee has set about trying to make
 Ohio State’s highly decentralized bureaucracy more efficient. He said 
he planned to cut $1 billion from the university’s $5 billion budget in 
the next five years.
“We are like Noah’s Ark,” he said. “We do two of everything.”
The university saved $20 million simply by switching to common vendors 
for pens, copiers and overnight shipping; previously Ohio State’s 14 
colleges chose their own. Creating a common expense report will save $75
 million. 
“When I got here, I asked to see their long-term financial model, and 
they brought me a paper for one year, and I said, ‘What?’ ” said Geoff 
Chatas, a former banker whom Mr. Gee hired in 2010 as chief financial 
officer. “Now we have a 15-year plan.” 
Mr. Gee said he was considering selling off Ohio State’s airports and 
golf courses, and he might privatize campus parking, though faculty 
members are balking at the idea. Last year, Ohio State became the first 
public university to issue a 100-year bond, for $500 million.
He is also is trying to beef up Ohio State’s enrollment of out-of-state 
and international students, who bring in more tuition revenue and higher
 test scores. And, he is pressing alumni for more money, a task in which
 he is particularly skilled. 
At a ceremony to honor a $100 million donation from Leslie Wexner, the 
clothing magnate and Ohio State graduate, Mr. Gee choked back tears. 
“Every time I get a lot of money I cry,” Mr. Gee told the crowd. “And I got a lot of tears left.”        
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment