Incidentally, you may want to go back a couple of rants and see just who is in the 47% that has Mitt's contempt. Chances are good that you are one of them.
In Case You Had Any Doubt About Whether Romney Believed What He Said About 'The 47%'...
AP
So, viewing these folks as not taking responsibility for themselves was not just stupid and wrong; it was deeply insulting.
Romney quickly disavowed the remarks, and as the campaign progressed, many Americans seemed to forget about them — including the tens of millions of less-well-off Americans in rural "red states" who voted for him.
But yesterday, in a post-mortem conference call with rich donors, Romney made new remarks that say the same thing a different way.
Obama won the election, Romney said, because Obama is giving "gifts" to many segments of the population, including women.
The remarks on the conference call reveal three things about Romney, two of which we already knew:
- He tailors his remarks to what he thinks the people he's talking to want to hear. (There's nothing inherently wrong with this. Most good salespeople do it. But it's certainly valid to ask what these salespeople actually believe, and in the case of Romney, we still haven't gotten a clear answer. It's also strange that Romney hasn't learned by now that when you say anything in the context of a presidential campaign, you're talking to the whole country.)
- He really doesn't have much respect for people who aren't rich — or, at least, for those who accept any sort of government services, benefits, or help. Perhaps this is a common view of those in Romney's social circles. If so, it reflects the worldview that Republicans seem desperate to cling to, that the world is made up of "makers" and "takers" and that only the former deserve any respect. The wholesale embrace of this view would be more understandable if so many Romney voters weren't — in the Republican definition — in the "taker" category.
- He's a sore loser.
(He lost, it seems safe to say, because he doesn't understand or care about the circumstances of most people in this country. You can argue about the effectiveness of social and poverty programs, civil rights laws, and other attributes of a progressive, modern society, but viewing all these things as "gifts" is deeply polarizing at best.)
Romney's concession speech on election night was gracious. Too bad he didn't stop with that one.
SEE ALSO: Romney Blames Loss On Obama "Gifts" To Minorities, Women, And Poor People
No comments:
Post a Comment